[leafnode-list] Re: Header PATH and FQDN

[Lurkos]

*Adam Funk* wrote:

>> Yet, I will put this on a ToDo-list, and if there are no important 
>> reasons against some solution like this:
>
> Let me clarify that I don't think this is a big deal!  I was just
> pointing out what I know about why the local Path header *might* be
> undesirable for some people.

It's not a big deal for me too.
I was just asking why Leafnode adds this header and explaing that
acquiring a real actual FQDN is not trivial.

-- 
Lurkos