[leafnode-list] Re: running texpire weekly instead of daily?
Adam Funk
a24061 at ducksburg.com
Tue Aug 28 12:56:51 CEST 2012
On 2012-08-22, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 12.07.2012 13:06, schrieb Adam Funk:
>> I have a fairly long retention period in my leafnode configuration,
>> and the cron.daily/leafnode job takes about 1 hour to run. (I'm
>> running leafnode-2.0.0.alpha20110807b.luascript, and the cron script
>> might have been copied from an old Debian/Ubuntu package.)
>>
>> Is the texpire running time related more to the size of the spool or
>> the number of articles that it decides to delete?
>
> Adam,
>
> it is the number of articles that matters most, and to how many groups
> they are cross-posted.
>
>> Would it do any harm to run it weekly instead of daily?
>
> I don't think so, if you can spare the disk space for expired articles
> for six more days (which I suppose). There are no implicit dependencies
> on texpire being run daily. Leafnode was originally written in the
> 1990s when disk space was a premium. :)
Thanks. I asked the same question in news.software.readers & was
advised to try it & see. In case anyone here is interested, here are
the results I got:
days texpire h:m:s per m:s per
since run million million
last time deletions retentions
run
1 1:20:56 07:09:06 37:23
1 1:21:23 00:02:03 37:34
1 1:21:59 15:14:27 37:50
1 1:19:31 15:32:24 36:40
1 1:24:04 05:57:46 38:45
1 1:21:09 12:07:42 37:23
1 1:20:09 11:54:04 36:54
4 1:24:11 04:55:53 38:43
7 1:23:34 20:12:31 38:16
7 1:27:13 14:06:30 39:47
7 1:28:35 18:24:21 40:15
(The number of deletions ranged from 142 to 4427; the number retained
stayed around 2,100,000.)
More information about the leafnode-list
mailing list